Archive for the ‘Generational Issues’ Category

Increasing Youth Voter Turnout: Easier Said Than Done

December 5th, 2011
I  Dougherty Photo - Nov  2010

Guest blog from Ilona Dougherty

Youth voter turnout appears to have increased in the last federal election, but just barely: 38.8% of 18-24 year-olds cast a ballot in 2011, compared with 37.4% in 2008. While any increase in democratic participation is a good thing, this obviously leaves plenty of room for improvement.

Given that, it’s not surprising that Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand recently called for a comprehensive national strategy to engage young voters in Canada. He’s talking about the type of strategy that involves all electoral stakeholders and addresses the decades-long decline in youth voter participation.

This is no small undertaking. There will no doubt be plenty of discussions both inside and outside of Elections Canada about what an effective national strategy looks like, and hopefully the opportunity for healthy debate amongst everyone affected—including young people. With this in mind, it seemed fitting to start such a debate by putting in my two cents.

To be effective, the kind of national strategy Mr. Mayrand is suggesting must do three things: target those youth who can (but don’t) vote, actively mobilize these youth by asking them to vote, and accurately measure its impact.

Targeting youth who can (but don’t) vote

For the last decade, election agencies across Canada have focused on classroom civic education programs as a key element of their youth outreach strategies. This was reasonable, given that education is positively associated with participation in elections.

Unfortunately these civic education programs don’t have any noticeable effect on voter participation. In 1999, the Ontario government introduced mandatory civics classes for all high-school students. The result? Nothing. There was no measurable impact on youth turnout in Ontario, and studies in the US have found similar results.

This is hardly surprising. Ask the average 24-year-old how much they remember from any high school class and you’ll quickly understand the problem. An effective national youth engagement strategy should therefore focus on the millions of 20-something Canadians who aren’t voting, and not just students currently in junior high & high schools who can’t vote yet.

Asking youth to vote

An effective national strategy should also invest in tactics that actively mobilize youth. As Elections Canada’s new national youth survey results—and Mr. Mayrand’s comments—make clear, the key issue is not convenience. Online voting has now been tested in several jurisdictions, and it hasn’t been a silver bullet for low voter turnout. Similarly, seven provinces and territories ran elections this fall with a focus on making voting more convenient, yet turnout hit record lows across the country.

So what does work? The answer is simple: ask young people to vote. Elections Canada’s survey results show that young people who were contacted by a political party were significantly more likely to cast a ballot than those who weren’t (83% versus 68%). Having a parent, friend, or roommate who talks about politics also makes young person more likely to participate. There are dozens of rigorous field experiments that reinforce the same basic conclusion: if you ask them, they will vote.

This type of active mobilization is important because young Canadians are currently the group least likely to be solicited: only 40% of them were contacted in any way by a party or candidate during the last federal election. Changing that is a crucial part of any comprehensive strategy, and that means changing what political parties, NGOs, and community organizations do in order to moblize young voters.

Making sure that it works

Finally, a national youth strategy should measure the impact it has on young voters. Elections Canada does a great job of collecting data, be it through surveys like the one cited above, or simply by counting how many youth cast a ballot. As part of a truly national strategy, provincial and municipal election agencies should follow suit. Without reliable data about who votes and who doesn’t, it’s impossible to effectively steer this type of national initiative.

A national youth strategy is a good start in addressing the challenge of declining youth voter turnout, especially one that recognizes the need to involve stakeholders at all levels in meaningful dialogue. But once we have had that debate, moving from strategy to effective action, will be easier said then done. We will need put aside current quick fix approaches to youth voter mobilization that have limited effectiveness; be it vote mobs (sorry, Rick Mercer) or reaching out to just students or already engaged young leaders—and ensure that we’re focusing on the more difficult to implement strategies that will actually lead to getting youth to the polls in the long run.

 

 

Occupied with Excuses!

November 2nd, 2011
ALawPhoto - Keys

Guest blog from Alvin Law

I wish I knew when one officially gets old.   I suppose it’s different for each person but for me, I have a disturbing clue.  I think it’s when you find yourself saying, “These kids nowadays!”  The irony is I really like “kids” making part of my living speaking to everyone from kindergarten to post-secondary students around North America since 1988.  The problem I am having has to do with the recent phenomenon of the “occupying movement” that started in Manhattan and is growing to where sites are set on Canadian cities including where I live in Calgary. The principles they are citing are deserving of respect as there is a growing gap between the rich and the poor.  I have always had a big place in my heart for those who struggle with real-life issues surrounding poverty, disability and inequity in a cruel place called humanity.  I also agree that the salaries of some executives seem remarkably high considering they don’t do all the work of a corporation all by themselves. And, I totally agree with one’s right to protest having disagreed with several issues in my lifetime and not always being politically correct about it either. You had to see a “but” coming, right?  Absolutely!

I have read and listened to several interviews with the organizers of these growing events and the first thing that occurred to me was; these are the best spokespeople they could find?  I have always been fascinated by what contributes to one’s credibility having had mine questioned more times than I can count and my comments about these people are not intended to insult them (had that happen to me a few times too) but, really?   I do not have an MBA but I do understand that capitalism tends to focus on making money, not just passing it out to those who whine ‘cause they don’t have any.  I also understand that when a company goes public, they ask people for their money and in return promise to give them back any profits earned by something called a shareholder.  True, some companies are a little too obsessed with “profit” but society is full of entities that are too obsessed to make any common sense.  Since my wife and I own our own business, we can’t brag about creating jobs for anyone but us but where small business is legitimately responsible for creation of many jobs, big corporations create thousands.  It really is about scale.  But here’s where things get a bit sticky. Most of these protesters don’t seem to have a job and as unfortunate as that is, why is it capitalism’s fault?

True, in the last few days, these protests have attracted other disgruntled groups who do have jobs, the largest entity being organized labor. I was raised in a blue-collar home and my father was a heavy-duty machinery mechanic for 57 years, although he was not a fan of unions. The protestors claim the bailout of the banks is why they’re mad.  Didn’t a couple of car companies with unions get bailed out too?  Rather ironic.

What’s even more ironic is if you explore the website for “adbusters”, the Vancouver based group that gave birth to this movement, they remind me of a throwback to the 1960’s and “Hippies”.  They were known for lots of things, weren’t they?  “Make love, not war”, was their calling card and I’m assuming they evoked a similar emotion from old farts who probably reacted with the words, “These kids nowadays”.  Adbusters’ motivation is worthy of respect but when I searched their site, I saw a disconnect. They seem pacifist but condone violence…although not officially.  They invite their followers to “topple existing power structures and forge a major shift in the way we will live in the 21st century”.  So, just out of curiosity, shift to what? They don’t seem to have a strategy, any concrete ideas or an iota of acknowledging that the world, especially the Western world, needs money or capital to exist. Is that unfair?  Patently!  Sort of like being born without arms, huh?

This blog is not about me but I need to make the reference so as you are reading this, you might understand my perspective. I grew up in Saskatchewan (no shots at my football team, okay?), the acknowledged birthplace of Medicare and a socialist hotbed. Born out of the co-operative movement and led by the great Canadian, Tommy Douglas, the shift was significant and for the time, dead on. Not to over-simplify but there is an admirable notion to the idea that a community can work together, pool their resources and share the profits. Nobody is more important than another and those unable to contribute will still share the wealth.  Sounds pretty good, right?  Of course it does. The only real drawback is taking place in real time in the very province I left in 2000.  For the first time in over fifty years, Saskatchewan has shifted from the bottom of Canada’s economic barrel to the cream of the crop.  Why?  Well, I won’t get into politics here but it seems a key to the change was moving from a socialist model to a capitalist one.  Is it perfect?  Of course not but there is one simple truth to be addressed.

I was adopted by foster parents when I was three weeks old and being a ward of the provincial government, I could have “milked” the system and never had to actually “do” anything for my whole life. But my parents would have none of that. They taught me to use my feet for hands, but more important, they constantly preached independence.  My dad used to say, “There ain’t no stretch limo gonna show up to take you to life…you’re going to have to walk every step!”

So for Adbusters and your throng of kool-aid drinkers, please help me understand why all of you are not just a bunch of lazy complainers who would rather make excuses than provide real solutions?  Maybe I am not old after all, I’ve just been around long enough to understand how naïve you really are!

The Truth About Young Voters

October 5th, 2011
I  Dougherty Photo - Nov  2010

Guest blog from Ilona Dougherty

It’s been a busy year for democracy in Canada. Along with the federal election in May, eight provinces and territories will hold regional or local elections before 2011 is over. And after all the ballots have been counted, we can expect to see the usual articles bemoaning the low level of participation in Canadian elections.

Some of these articles will correctly identify low levels of youth participation as the primary driver of declining turnout. Unfortunately, Canada’s pundits and political commentators also tend to perpetuate several misconceptions about our nation’s youth—so I am going to debunk them ahead of time.

 Misconception #1: Youth are cynical

Perhaps the most common misconception is that young Canadians lack faith in democracy. Anyone who believes this simply hasn’t looked at the evidence. Youth have just as much (or little) faith in our democratic process and institutions as their parents’ and grandparents’ generations, and it doesn’t explain the difference in voter turnout.

Similarly, you’ll sometimes hear that youth have turned to alternative forms of political participation—such as public demonstrations or online activism—in lieu of voting. It’s true that young Canadians are more likely to participate in non-traditional ways. However, the youth who take part in these activities are also more likely to vote. What we’re seeing is young activists engaging through both traditional and alternative means, while their unengaged peers sit on the sidelines.

Misconception #2: Youth are students

Treating “youth” and “students” as synonymous was one of the limitations of the vote mobs we saw during the federal election this spring. Rick Mercer’s original video message, well intentioned as it was, only addressed young Canadians in colleges and universities. The vote mobs that sprang up in response to Mercer reflected this, having been organized exclusively by students.

This is a common sin of omission. Journalists regularly conflate youth and students when talking about young voters. The numbers tell another story. Census data shows that 58% of Canadians aged 18-24—the prime demographic for post-secondary enrolment—are either full or part-time students. The other 42% are not. They won’t be found on a campus or reached through a student union.

The problem with focusing exclusively on students is that ignores the group in the greatest need of mobilization. Market researchers call them “young independents”—the young people who have left home, but have not yet settled down or started a family. Because they lack both stable community ties and the direct influence of a parent—two key pathways to civic engagement—these non-students are less likely to get involved on their own.

Misconception #3: Youth won’t vote

As with many social problems, some people express a defeatist attitude about youth voter apathy. There are skeptics who say that youth turnout will stay low regardless of the measures taken to address it. Of course, as with most defeatist attitudes to social problems, this is an uninformed cop-out.

Young voters can be mobilized. That’s a fact. It has been proven over and over again with the highest degree of rigour possible in the social sciences. Simply asking young people to vote consistently increases turnout by about 10%.

The problem is that we’re not even trying that. You’ve probably heard the rote statistic about how only 37% of Canadians aged 18-24 cast a ballot in the 2008 federal election, compared with 68% of those over 65. But here’s something you may not have heard: during that same election, the majority of youth were not contacted in any way by a candidate or political party. What about the 65-plus crowd? Well, 69% of them were contacted directly. When young Canadians aren’t being asked to participate, it’s hardly surprising that they don’t turn out for elections.

Apathy is Boring has been working to address this problem since 2004. During every election, we provide resources for youth and mobilize them to get out and vote. However, we’re just one organization—a real solution requires action from the key players in our democracy. It requires political parties that are willing to court a new constituency. It requires candidates whose commitment to youth goes beyond a few throwaway lines in their platform. And most of all, it requires that all of us abandon our misconceptions about youth.

Time For A Radical Rethink Of Work After 50

May 24th, 2011

by Julia Moulden – Six Billion Reasons to Get Out of Bed Each Day

Julia Moulden is championing the powerful new idea that “doing good” can mean more than volunteering and philanthropy. That how we earn our living can become the way we give back. Moulden presents a new group of role models — ordinary men and women who have reinvented what they do for a living. They’re people who want their work to reflect their values, and help them make a difference in the world. A popular Huffington Post blogger, Moulden is also a popular author whose latest book, RIPE: Rich, Rewarding Work After 50, just hit the bookshelves.

Across North America, ten thousand people turn 50 each and every day. You may be in this group. No doubt, lots of people in your organization are.

It’s no secret that aging — our own and our society’s — is on everyone’s minds. Unfortunately, most of what we’re hearing through the media is negative. Too often, it’s about how these years are a time of decline. How the baby (more…)

Millennials Learning to Like Traditional Work Environment

November 22nd, 2010

Cam Marston

by Cam Marston – Generational Dynamic Expert

Business casual. Cubicles. Formal office structure and standardized salary systems. Those were the surprising leading choices of Millennials in a recent Canadian survey on employment. While we have come to stereotype Millennials as entitled job-hoppers who want to have their cake and eat it, too, this and other surveys increasingly portray Millennials as adapting to the working world as the rest of us know it.

The survey also found that most prospective Millennial employees evaluate job opportunities by –surprise! (more…)