Archive for the ‘The Economy’ Category

Top 3 Trends for 2012

January 11th, 2012
Richard Worzel

Guest blog from Richard Worzel

Leading forecaster and futurist Richard Worzel challenges organizations to examine the future and plan for the dizzying changes to come. Worzel can equip your organization with the ability to understand the changes to be faced in the years ahead, and the tools to leverage those changes to revolutionize and dominate your industry. A Chartered Financial Analyst, he is also a best-selling author and frequent media commentator on business and economic trends.

The year ahead is going to be a tumultuous one, challenging in political, economic, and financial terms. Despite this, there are opportunities for those prepared to take advantage of them, because uncertain times mean that market share is up for grabs.

1)    Yes, China’s influence will continue to rise, but…  Napoleon famously said, “China is a sleeping giant. Let it sleep.” Well, China’s very much awake now, and throwing her weight around – although cautiously. If I were (God forbid) Emperor of China, I would require my minions to tread cautiously, to smile a lot at our trading partners and neighbors, and to make our gains slowly, one salami slice at a time, never appearing too greedy or overreaching. I would practice soft diplomacy, offering aid and comfort where I could do so cheaply, loudly proclaiming our respect for other countries’ internal policies, taking leadership positions in things, like climate change, where I knew I was going to have to make changes anyway, and generally trying to look like a good global citizen. I would act, in short, as if time were on my side, and I was going to be the next Big Thing.

And generally speaking, that is precisely what China is doing – except that every once in a while the mask slips, and the avarice and aggression shows, as with the boundary disputes with other countries, especially as related to the South “China” Sea, which China (the nation) seems to be trying to interpret literally as being a Chinese lake.

But China has an Achilles’ heel – several of them, in fact – and does not have (much) time on its side. Its biggest weakness is that it is aging faster than any other significant country on Earth. Because of its One Child policy, China’s population is expected to peak, and begin declining, sometime around 2020 – within the next 10 years. And its labor force is already in decline, even as the demands for higher wages push its cost structures higher.

Meanwhile, although there is a great deal of pride in China’s new affluence among the Chinese, that affluence is not evenly spread, and there is unrest among those who remain poor. Add to this the widespread corruption of Chinese officials at all levels, which often provokes revolts, like the one in Wukan, which leads to simmering dissatisfaction among many Chinese.

This will further be exacerbated by the fact that China’s factories are automating almost as quickly as those of the developed world, which threatens to slow the rate of job creation, productivity, and affluence markedly over the next 10 years. Yet, China dare not automate; to do so would mean a loss of competitiveness, which would produce even worse results as industries would move elsewhere.
So, with that in mind, what would I, as self-appointed Emperor of China, do? Worry about a future I couldn’t control, and for which I could not see a clear path forward. The next 10 years will mark the beginning of the end of China’s ascension, and if I were Emperor, I’d think about retiring to some warm, cushy haven before the revolution came. Chinese Spring, anyone?

The implications are for China to step up its attempts to increase power and influence, and throw its weight around even more actively before that power starts to wane, but as quietly as possible. Look for China to try to make this the China Decade, especially in finance, trade, and geopolitics, as it attempts to pull in as much as it can while it can.

2) Haggling returns to North American retailing. Smart retailers are recognizing that it’s no longer enough to post a sign saying “10% off” to attract consumers, but that consumers are more demanding now, and are moving away from the traditional “no haggle” approach to buying. Moreover, haggling offers two additional benefits to consumers: it’s become somewhat of a game where they can enjoy the thrill of the hunt; and it offers bragging rights when talking with their friends. As a result, haggling has been emerging in two different ways, one passive, and the other active.

The passive form of haggling is to wait for sales. You can witness this almost anywhere when consumers see an item they like in a store, and ask if it’s on sale. When they’re told that it’s not, they turn up their noses, and say they’ll wait until it is. This might be described as “temporal haggling”, where the consumer is saying, “I’ll wait until you lower the price before I buy it. And if you don’t lower it enough, I won’t buy it.” Smart stores are responding in creative ways. Some salespeople say, “No, that’s not on sale, but it will be starting next week,” which amounts to a counter-offer. A smart consumer will reply by saying, “Can you put it aside for me until then?”, implicitly offering to buy it if they do. Some salespeople say no, others say “Sure.” The net result is that store and consumer have haggled over the price to agree on a sale/purchase. Yet the smart retailer actually has an advantage in this exchange: they get to name the sale price in temporal haggling.

By comparison, in active, more traditional haggling the consumer takes the initiative, saying something like “What’s your best price on this widget?” If the salesperson replies with the sticker price, the haggle is over and the consumer leaves. If the salesperson names a price, the consumer responds dismissively, and says, “I wouldn’t pay a nickel over $X for that”, and the salesperson can choose to respond or not. This is, as I say, traditional marketplace haggling.

If a retailer wants to capitalize on the re-emergence of haggling into the North American marketplace, they need to anticipate it, and come up with a range of responses. One might be to say, “We can’t discount this item today, but it is going on sale next week. Would you like to put a deposit on it to hold it until then?” The retailer regains the initiative this way, and moves towards a close. Or better still, the retailer should look for a way to add value rather than cut price by making a counter-offer like, “No, I’m sorry, we can’t discount that item. But we can offer you a 50% discount on a matching accessory if you buy it.”

Regardless of approach, though, retailers should be prepared to return to marketplace haggling, and have a range of responses ready to deal with it. Consumers, as always, should decide what they want, and what their bottom line is in getting it.

3) Health care magic blossoms. Putting aside the issue of cost, which concerns everyone, the ability of health care to solve problems is beginning to move at computer speeds, in part because IT is increasingly being used by doctors, nurses, hospitals – and patients – to manage health care, and in part because research is increasingly being done using smart, powerful computer tools to perform research and execute treatments. Among the changes in the immediate future of health care are:

  • The rapidly rising ability to repair failing hearts and minds (or at least brains) and other organs with stem cells. Stem cell treatments are starting to move out of the laboratory and into the operating room, and 2012 will see hundreds of people receiving this kind of therapy.
  • Similarly, 3D printers, which have been in development for roughly 20 years, are now good enough that they are starting to be used to create replacement organs from a patient’s own tissue. This will gradually move into mainstream medicine, with replacement hearts, livers, and kidneys being at the top of the list.
  • Quadriplegics will increasingly be able to interact with the world through prosthetics controlled by thought alone, either through electrodes that interpret brain wave patterns, or implanted chips which interpret specific thought-impulses.
  • Retinal implants are starting to emerge that can help blind people discern light, shapes, and some objects. The implication is that we may be able to help aging boomers improve their failing eyesight as they age – one of the biggest complaints of old age!
  • Health care is increasingly falling into the hands of the patient – literally. Smartphones, which are fundamentally wearable computers with all the capabilities of what used to be called “supercomputers”, can now work with Bluetooth-enabled sensors to monitor various aspects of health, from the vigor of your workout, to the health of your heart, to the level of your blood sugar. This will lead to a revolution in health management, with consumers sometimes way out in front of practitioner.
  • Likewise, as patients become more and more comfortable with researching medical conditions and treatments online; they are demanding an increasing role in their own diagnosis and treatment; becoming active, important advocates for fund-raising and acceptance of treatments; and blunt critics of health care practitioners through social media and word of mouth. Smart practitioners are accepting this trend and rolling with it. Old school practitioners are resisting, but may wind up steamrolled by it.
  • Crowdsourcing of tough diagnoses, and novel solutions to the medical and financial problems of health care promise to open yet another front in the health care revolution. This follows on with the success of crowdsourcing in helping leading-edge research scientists in astronomy (galaxyzoo.org) and protein research (Foldit game softwear).
  • Sequencing your genome gets cheap. Sequencing the first genome cost billions of dollars and took decades to perform (culminating in the Human Genome Project). Today it costs about $1,000 (although analysis costs significantly more). Within 10 years, it will cost $100, and analysis will cost about $500 more, and will provide you a complete run-down of where your vulnerabilities lie, and what you can do to forestall future health problems. For 2012, we will see incremental advances towards that goal, with major diseases identified, and a short list of things you do – and don’t – want to do or eat prescribed. This is the true beginning of personalized medicine, and it will revolutionize health care.

Occupied with Excuses!

November 2nd, 2011
ALawPhoto - Keys

Guest blog from Alvin Law

I wish I knew when one officially gets old.   I suppose it’s different for each person but for me, I have a disturbing clue.  I think it’s when you find yourself saying, “These kids nowadays!”  The irony is I really like “kids” making part of my living speaking to everyone from kindergarten to post-secondary students around North America since 1988.  The problem I am having has to do with the recent phenomenon of the “occupying movement” that started in Manhattan and is growing to where sites are set on Canadian cities including where I live in Calgary. The principles they are citing are deserving of respect as there is a growing gap between the rich and the poor.  I have always had a big place in my heart for those who struggle with real-life issues surrounding poverty, disability and inequity in a cruel place called humanity.  I also agree that the salaries of some executives seem remarkably high considering they don’t do all the work of a corporation all by themselves. And, I totally agree with one’s right to protest having disagreed with several issues in my lifetime and not always being politically correct about it either. You had to see a “but” coming, right?  Absolutely!

I have read and listened to several interviews with the organizers of these growing events and the first thing that occurred to me was; these are the best spokespeople they could find?  I have always been fascinated by what contributes to one’s credibility having had mine questioned more times than I can count and my comments about these people are not intended to insult them (had that happen to me a few times too) but, really?   I do not have an MBA but I do understand that capitalism tends to focus on making money, not just passing it out to those who whine ‘cause they don’t have any.  I also understand that when a company goes public, they ask people for their money and in return promise to give them back any profits earned by something called a shareholder.  True, some companies are a little too obsessed with “profit” but society is full of entities that are too obsessed to make any common sense.  Since my wife and I own our own business, we can’t brag about creating jobs for anyone but us but where small business is legitimately responsible for creation of many jobs, big corporations create thousands.  It really is about scale.  But here’s where things get a bit sticky. Most of these protesters don’t seem to have a job and as unfortunate as that is, why is it capitalism’s fault?

True, in the last few days, these protests have attracted other disgruntled groups who do have jobs, the largest entity being organized labor. I was raised in a blue-collar home and my father was a heavy-duty machinery mechanic for 57 years, although he was not a fan of unions. The protestors claim the bailout of the banks is why they’re mad.  Didn’t a couple of car companies with unions get bailed out too?  Rather ironic.

What’s even more ironic is if you explore the website for “adbusters”, the Vancouver based group that gave birth to this movement, they remind me of a throwback to the 1960’s and “Hippies”.  They were known for lots of things, weren’t they?  “Make love, not war”, was their calling card and I’m assuming they evoked a similar emotion from old farts who probably reacted with the words, “These kids nowadays”.  Adbusters’ motivation is worthy of respect but when I searched their site, I saw a disconnect. They seem pacifist but condone violence…although not officially.  They invite their followers to “topple existing power structures and forge a major shift in the way we will live in the 21st century”.  So, just out of curiosity, shift to what? They don’t seem to have a strategy, any concrete ideas or an iota of acknowledging that the world, especially the Western world, needs money or capital to exist. Is that unfair?  Patently!  Sort of like being born without arms, huh?

This blog is not about me but I need to make the reference so as you are reading this, you might understand my perspective. I grew up in Saskatchewan (no shots at my football team, okay?), the acknowledged birthplace of Medicare and a socialist hotbed. Born out of the co-operative movement and led by the great Canadian, Tommy Douglas, the shift was significant and for the time, dead on. Not to over-simplify but there is an admirable notion to the idea that a community can work together, pool their resources and share the profits. Nobody is more important than another and those unable to contribute will still share the wealth.  Sounds pretty good, right?  Of course it does. The only real drawback is taking place in real time in the very province I left in 2000.  For the first time in over fifty years, Saskatchewan has shifted from the bottom of Canada’s economic barrel to the cream of the crop.  Why?  Well, I won’t get into politics here but it seems a key to the change was moving from a socialist model to a capitalist one.  Is it perfect?  Of course not but there is one simple truth to be addressed.

I was adopted by foster parents when I was three weeks old and being a ward of the provincial government, I could have “milked” the system and never had to actually “do” anything for my whole life. But my parents would have none of that. They taught me to use my feet for hands, but more important, they constantly preached independence.  My dad used to say, “There ain’t no stretch limo gonna show up to take you to life…you’re going to have to walk every step!”

So for Adbusters and your throng of kool-aid drinkers, please help me understand why all of you are not just a bunch of lazy complainers who would rather make excuses than provide real solutions?  Maybe I am not old after all, I’ve just been around long enough to understand how naïve you really are!

The Case for Optimism and Global Economic Recovery

October 28th, 2011
J. Carroll

Guest blog from Jim Carroll

I was in Billings, Montana recently, speaking at the annual meeting of a financial group.  The audience included a large cross section of business executives from throughout the Midwest. My talk centred around the trends that might provide for sustainable economic growth. Here’s what I focused on:

  • a significant and lasting change in perspective. I spend a lot of time with major international organizations, either in strategic leadership meetings or at various association events or conferences. I often run a text message poll at the start of such sessions to gauge the audience perspective of the current rate of economic growth. As I noted in this post, I’ve seen quite a change in attitude and perspective in the last few months.
  • significant growth is emerging from “solving the big problems.” I am a big believer that the efforts to solve the big challenges with respect to energy, the environment and health care will provide the momentum to kickstart the economy once again. I spend a lot of time examining signs of innovation and growth; and there is a tremendous amount of mind share being devoted to each of these areas.
  • fundamental and long lasting growth trends in global markets. Before the economy went sour in 2008, McKinsey was extremely bullish on the prospects for economic growth driven by the rapid industrialization of emerging economies, noting that “almost a billion new consumers will enter the global marketplace in the next decade …. with an income level that allows spending on discretionary goods,” and that “the ranks of the middle class will swell by 1.8 billion to become 52% of total population, up from 30% today.” I think on a long term basis, those trends are still valid and will provide for tremendous economic growth.
  • rapid response of organizations to the fast emergence of new markets and opportunities. I am seeing a significant number of organizations focused at the top on “revenue innovation” — that is, generating revenue by entering new markets or through new products and solutions. One CEO of a major global organization put it to me this way: “traditional markets are declining … we’re going other places that have better growth opportunities.” This is the concept of chameleon revenue, which you should read about here.
  • signs of various industries reinventing themselves. China and India and Brazil are cleaning our clocks when it comes to manufacturing, with sheer brainpower and design capabilities; the period from 1990 to 2010 saw the decline of the North American manufacturing industry with the resultant massive economic shock. But what I’m seeing out there tells me that North American companies will learn to compete again by challenging old assumptions, and by challenging themselves to do things differently this time around; for example, with mass customization, and through the reinvention of traditional manufacturing processes.
  • the emergence of intelligent infrastructure. Quite simply, every device around us is going to gain intelligence in the next decade. We’ll have awareness of their status, location, and address; this leads to the birth of countless new products, companies and industries. There is real transformative industry growth will come when everything plugs into the cloud, and as location intelligence becomes a significant transformative trend.
  • the impact of the next generation. While many people bemoan the ‘work ethic’ of Gen-Y, I think they are likely the most entrepreneurial generation ever. They collaborate, think, and generate ideas in exciting and different ways, and I think that provides them with a motivation to “do their own thing” unlike any other generation in history. And that is a significant driver for economic growth. During the recession of 2001, 569,750 new companies were created in North America – mostly small businesses. And companies with less than 20 employees accounted for 100% of the new job growth from 1990 to 2000. Global experience shows similar trends. That’s the context of what this ‘next generation’ will do.

As a futurist, I’m optimistic and bullish on the future. (I have to be; I can’t quite go on stage and say to people — “guess what — your future sucks!”)

I don’t think there is any wishful thinking behind this sentiment ; it comes from the discussions and observations I get from going out and speaking to tens of thousands of people at various conferences and events through the last several months.

It’s Not Just Stocks that Are at Risk

August 12th, 2011

Richard Worzel

Guest blog from Richard Worzel

The stock markets have fallen out of bed since President Obama signed the ludicrous debt ceiling deal. I don’t wonder about that; what I wonder is why they took so long. I was expecting stocks to fall two weeks earlier than they did. But now the question becomes: What happens next? This is actually a much deeper question than it seems, because it goes far beyond just the behavior of stock prices and markets. But let’s start with stocks. (more…)

Robert Fisher at CSAE

July 18th, 2011

Sarah Delsey by Sarah Delsey

On Thursday I had the pleasure of attending the Canadian Society of Association Executives’ Summer Summit. We sponsored Robert Fisher for the opening luncheon, and this was a real treat as I had never met him prior to this.  His presentation was great, he spoke a bit about his history in the media, and the major political milestones that have led Ontario and Toronto to where we are today.  As well, he made some really interesting predictions about the upcoming provincial election.  One of the highlights for me though, was the Q&A.  I always think that it is during this portion that speakers really show their mettle.  It’s a great chance for them to show their years of experience in their area; anyone can memorize a speech, but navigating tough questions from the audience is a completely different animal.  And kudos to CSAE members for holding no punches!  Tough questions did abound, and Robert was fully prepared to be candid and genuine, and he definitely won over the respect of the audience during this portion.  I’d highly recommend Robert for anyone interested in a speaker on journalism and politics, he definitely knows his stuff!